Open xatapult opened 3 weeks ago
It's worse than that, even if you could specify ""
, it wouldn't do what you want, because:
In other words, the effect of several exclude-inline-prefixes attributes among the ancestors of p:inline is cumulative.
It isn't the most recent ancestor [p:]exclude-inline-prefixes
attribute that matters, it's the union of all the ancestors.
On the one hand, we could certainly make it possible to "add them back in", but on the other, it seems like the pipeline could be rewritten so it didn't put #all
at the top if that doesn't do the right thing.
Hmm. Very inconvenient.
Add a exclude-inline-prefixes="#none"
that "resets" this?
Ok, definitely a VNext issue
The standard reads about the
exclude-inline-prefixes
attribute:This seems to forbid that
exclude-inline-prefixes
can be empty (exclude-inline-prefixes=""
).Unfortunately, I ran into a use-case where on the root it declared
exclude-inline-prefixes="#all"
and on a deeper level I wanted locally to revert to excluding no prefixes. I couldn't do that and I don't see a reason why not.Maybe this is VNext issue, but it seems like a non-breaking change if we do 3.1 anyway.