Open SamWhited opened 7 years ago
I tried introducing a banner or a landing page mentioning the deprecation, but the RFC's don't appear to be part of the website code at all. I'm not sure how to modify these.
For what it's worth: on http://xmpp.org/extensions/index.html we don't link to the copy that's on our own server, but to something on https://datatracker.ietf.org instead.
Can we simply re-direct to the HTML version from the IETF? I personally find it much easier to read anyways.
I think the RFC's are in this repository: https://github.com/xsf/rfcs
Those are XMLs though, not HTML. @Kev, can you help out here?
Those are XMLs though, not HTML. @Kev, can you help out here?
The HTML versions are generated using xml2rfc --html
.
Any news? Linked to https://github.com/xsf/xmpp.org/issues/414
Hey guys, it’s been three years ;)
Linking to the corresponding RFCs on https://datatracker.ietf.org/ sounds sensible to me.
@wurstsalat3000: Thanks for this recall :)
Please look again: https://github.com/xsf/xmpp.org/issues/414 etc.
Actually, where exactly does it need to be deprecated?
Here it is obsolete: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc3920/
@Echolon it's about the one hosted on xmpp.org, not the one at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc3920/
@Echolon it's about the one hosted on xmpp.org, not the one at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc3920/
but isn't the status at IETF not the "true" one?
All files from: https://xmpp.org/rfcs/.
Example:
All IETF files are good.
This issue should be moved to xsf/rfcs.
@mwild1 @Zash could you move?
Over the last few days I've seen people link to the version of RFC 3920 on the website (https://xmpp.org/rfcs/rfc3920.html) and reference it multiple times. When I pointed out that it was deprecated they were suprised.
Maybe we should add a deprecation notice to the copy of RFC 3920 on the website?