xtaci / kcptun

A Quantum-Safe Secure Tunnel based on QPP, KCP, FEC, and N:M multiplexing.
MIT License
13.81k stars 2.53k forks source link

Does kcptun improve the acceleration effect on udp, and I think it supports the configuration of multiple ports, whether it can achieve load balancing between ports ? #913

Open maojianyou opened 1 year ago

maojianyou commented 1 year ago

问问题前先搜索ISSUE,并搞清楚下面的问题:

  1. 检查 -key xxx 至少三遍, 保证两边一致。
  2. 保证-nocomp, -datashard, -parityshard, -key, -crypt, -smuxver两边一致。
  3. 是否在服务器端,正确设定了转发的目标服务器地址 --target
  4. 是否在客户端,正确的连接到了 client的监听端口。
  5. 如果第3条不确定,尝试在服务器上telnet target port试试。
  6. 防火墙是否关闭了UDP通信,或者设置了UDP的最大发包速率?
  7. 两端的版本是否一致?
  8. 是不是最新版本?
  9. 两端分别是什么操作系统?
  10. 两端的输出日志是什么?

Before firing issue, make sure you figured out the following common questions.

PLEASE DO SEARCH FIRST.

  1. Check your -key xxx for at least 3 times, MAKE SURE both sides share the same secret.
  2. -nocomp, -datashard, -parityshard, -key, -crypt, -smuxver must be the same on both side.
  3. Did you correctly set the -target on the server side?
  4. Did you correctly connected to the listening port on client side?
  5. MAKE SURE telnet target port on your server successful(don't ask me why couldn't).
  6. Does your firewall allows UDP communications? (including your ISP Cable-Modem)
  7. Are you using the same version for both client & server
  8. Are you using the latest release?
  9. Which OS do you use?
  10. Which end for this issue related to, client or server?
cebernic commented 1 year ago

直接中文就好了,这语法太糟糕了

maojianyou commented 1 year ago

就是类似tinyfecvpn这种,支持tun VPN形式,还是就是多端口的情况,能否实现端口负载均衡,比如,A--B A:1000 B:1000 A:1001 B:1001

2个端口A到B 起2个程序,实现1000跟1001负载情况,不是单独走一个通道

@.***

发件人: Will Simith 发送时间: 2023-03-28 15:52 收件人: xtaci/kcptun 抄送: maojianyou; Author 主题: Re: [xtaci/kcptun] Does kcptun improve the acceleration effect on udp, and I think it supports the configuration of multiple ports, whether it can achieve load balancing between ports ? (Issue #913) 直接中文就好了,这语法太糟糕了 ― Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>