Closed StefanUlbrich closed 2 years ago
I think this is a great idea, which I do in my shadow package as well : https://github.com/tdegeus/pyxtensor . What do others think ? @JohanMabille @SylvainCorlay @wolfv
To sum up #96, the idea would be to keep this repo pure C++ and add a new repo (xtensor.py) that would contain the pure python stuff. The python package would vendor all dependencies (xtensor, xsimd and xtl). This would be consistent with what we do for the R and Julia bindings.
Makes sense @JohanMabille . Will be much easier to maintain and ship. So all for it!
Regarding the name xtensor.py
, wouldn't the .
cause problems e.g. in packaging?
Ah, it seems from other packages that you have experience with it. I will try to allocate some time for this soon
Installs headers via pip. Suitable for rapidly writing packages. Modified from the pybind11. Xtensor itself should be packaged and dded as a dependency too.