search

xuantl / open-hardware-monitor

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/open-hardware-monitor
0 stars 0 forks source link

ASRock 939Dual-SataII + Opteron 170. Missing+Incorrect Voltages/Cores #329

Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
What is expected is seeing 2 cores listed [Such as Temps/Core Load] for each 
core. What I am seeing is only a listing for Core #1 and Not Core#0. 
Additionally, the Mainboard is detected as 'Unknown'. Further, the voltages are 
not being displayed as intended with many not only missing/hidden but being 
misread.

I'm running OHM 0.40.0 Beta on the following system [relevant hardware listed]:
OS:  Windows XP SP2 32-bit
CPU: AMD Opteron 170
MB:  ASRock Socket 939 DualSata-II [Winbond W83627HF]
PSU: Rosewill CAPSTONE - 650w

I have included multiple reports for comparisons/informational purposes. The 
requested report from OHM along with the reports of both Monitoring/SMBus from 
HWMonitor and a screenshot of the two. The HWMonitor readings are correct 
according to AIDA64 and CoreTemp.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by NasumiRayne on 13 Mar 2012 at 7:52

Attachments:

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
[deleted comment]
GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
I would also like to apologize for the false claim on the second CPU core not 
being detected. This was due to OHM loading with with only 1 core being 
assigned by default rather than 2 of them. Resolving the issue and then 
reloading OHM correctly displayed both cores.

I would like to add the following from more testing:
CPU Clocks -> Bus Speed does not update when changed due to throttling 
programs/drivers such as AMD CnQ or in my case 'RMClock'. It will only report 
the Bus Speed as detected on first run of OHM. The lack of updates to 'Bus 
Speed' will further result in the 'Core Speed' being reported incorrectly as 
the non-changing BUS is being factored in with the 'Core Speed' Updates. 
Further, The Temperature reading between Core #1 and Core #2 are backwards with 
#2 showing the temp for #1 and Vice-Versa.

I have Re-uploaded fresh copies of the reports plus a register dump from 
Core-Temp. Left the original reports attached for historical reasons.

Original comment by NasumiRayne on 13 Mar 2012 at 10:25

Attachments: