Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
It's passing fine on my system (Windows 7 x64, Chrome Canary 17.0.917.0, ANGLE
r803, GeForce 330M).
Original comment by nicolas....@gmail.com
on 25 Oct 2011 at 6:31
On a system with an Intel HD Grpahics 2000, all mipmap levels are incorrect.
Interestingly it doesn't seem like it's simply using the wrong bias and
blending mipmaps:
bias 0 - expected: 255,000,000 was 255,128,128
bias 1 - expected: 000,255,000 was 255,128,128
bias 2 - expected: 000,000,255 was 128,255,128
bias 3 - expected: 255,255,000 was 128,128,255
bias 4 - expected: 255,000,255 was 255,255,128
bias 5 - expected: 000,255,255 was 255,128,255
bias 6 - expected: 255,128,128 was 128,255,255
bias 7 - expected: 128,128,128 was 255,191,191
bias 8 - expected: 128,255,128 was 191,191,191
It appears to be rendering a brighter version of the mipmap one level above the
intended one...
Original comment by nicolas....@gmail.com
on 25 Oct 2011 at 2:07
I believe some NVIDIA cards (at least the 8800, probably others) fail the
texldb DCT test, so that could explain this. I know ATI cards pass the test,
but no clue about Intel.
Original comment by j...@baumanfamily.com
on 25 Oct 2011 at 2:57
It doesn't pass on my ATI 4850
Original comment by g...@chromium.org
on 25 Oct 2011 at 4:07
It looks like this is caused by multi-sampling...
Original comment by nicolas....@gmail.com
on 25 Oct 2011 at 6:21
What does that mean? I'm drawing a solid color, there's no blending and I'm
drawing to the entire backbuffer.
Is the bug in the test itself or is the bug that tex2Dbias fails to do the
correct thing with multi-sampling on?
Original comment by g...@google.com
on 25 Oct 2011 at 8:18
This got fixed by turning off anti-aliasing in the test.
The problem was that anti-aliasing enabled centroid sampling, which changed the
texture coordinates slightly and thereby also the mipmap LOD calculation,
affecting which level gets sampled by tex2Dbias. The centroid issue itself got
fixed in r1192, which addressed issue 340.
Original comment by nicolas....@gmail.com
on 30 Oct 2012 at 7:27
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
g...@chromium.org
on 25 Oct 2011 at 5:26