Open ccritter opened 5 months ago
Describe the bug Windows Defender has detected XV3DTools'
xv1_train.exe
asWacatac.B!ml
trojan.Screenshots
Desktop:
- OS: Windows 11
- XV3DTools Version: 1.1.1
Additional context Version 1.1.0 still exists on my system and is not affected by Windows defender. Something in the last update has flagged it on Microsoft's malware ML database, and I'm hesitant to assume it's a false-positive considering it is an exe I downloaded from an otherwise unverified Google Drive zip. If there's any way that guarantees can be made about the safety of the executable, or if any of the internals can be open sourced, I would feel a lot better about using this tool going forward.
Thank you for your suggestion. The current release version is our modified 3DGS, and we will open source it in a later version
Describe the bug Windows Defender has detected XV3DTools'
xv1_train.exe
asWacatac.B!ml
trojan.Screenshots
Desktop:
- OS: Windows 11
- XV3DTools Version: 1.1.1
Additional context Version 1.1.0 still exists on my system and is not affected by Windows defender. Something in the last update has flagged it on Microsoft's malware ML database, and I'm hesitant to assume it's a false-positive considering it is an exe I downloaded from an otherwise unverified Google Drive zip. If there's any way that guarantees can be made about the safety of the executable, or if any of the internals can be open sourced, I would feel a lot better about using this tool going forward.
Wacatac.B!ml apparently is a false positive for windows defender, at least according to my google searches
Describe the bug Windows Defender has detected XV3DTools'
xv1_train.exe
asWacatac.B!ml
trojan.Screenshots![ApplicationFrameHost_RForFtlTxP](https://github.com/xverse-engine/XV3DGS-UEPlugin/assets/19559103/75b98dd7-b9e5-4f6e-bbee-029b26f21aab)
Desktop:
Additional context Version 1.1.0 still exists on my system and is not affected by Windows defender. Something in the last update has flagged it on Microsoft's malware ML database, and I'm hesitant to assume it's a false-positive considering it is an exe I downloaded from an otherwise unverified Google Drive zip. If there's any way that guarantees can be made about the safety of the executable, or if any of the internals can be open sourced, I would feel a lot better about using this tool going forward.