Closed kwea123 closed 5 years ago
On the other hand, the performance of monocular models (StereoUnsupFt-->Mono pt
and StereoUnsupFt-->Mono pt C,K
for what I tried) are the same as the results in the paper.
For all the stereo models, the results are tested on the validation set.
Hi, I noticed that your evaluation script gives different results from that given with Monodepth. Could you please explain what you changed in the evaluation script and why?
The unsupervised stereo algorithm should give the camera-view depth instead of LIDAR-view depth.
I download some of the pretrained models, and found that results are different from your paper. Here's one of the example (
release-StereoNoFt.ckpt
): abs_rel, sq_rel, rms, log_rms, d1_all, a1, a2, a3 0.0754, 0.6812, 4.023, 0.162, 0.000, 0.931, 0.971, 0.984In the paper (page 14) however, you have abs_rel, sq_rel, rms, log_rms, d1_all, a1, a2, a3 0.072, 0.665, 3.836, 0.153, 0.000, 0.936, 0.973, 0.986
The results obtained from your pretained model are slightly worse than what you report in the paper, could you please clarify the reason?