As mentioned in #44, I noticed something weird when plotting perturbations.
When normalizing the massive neutrino perturbations for plotting I normalize by the value of the \rho_\sigma function (from perturbations.jl) acting on a vector of all ones at the particular redshift.
I find that this is the same as the density I get from the background spline (bg.\rho0\scrM) of the background \rho_P0 function.
However when I call the background \rhoP0 function from the plotting script I get a different value than the one returned by \rho\sigma *a^-4 and the spline (both of which have the same value).
I find this especially weird since \rho_P0 is what is used to generate the spline.
Not sure if this issue will affect the evolution, but I will look into it more carefully.
As mentioned in #44, I noticed something weird when plotting perturbations.
When normalizing the massive neutrino perturbations for plotting I normalize by the value of the \rho_\sigma function (from perturbations.jl) acting on a vector of all ones at the particular redshift.
I find that this is the same as the density I get from the background spline (bg.\rho0\scrM) of the background \rho_P0 function.
However when I call the background \rhoP0 function from the plotting script I get a different value than the one returned by \rho\sigma *a^-4 and the spline (both of which have the same value). I find this especially weird since \rho_P0 is what is used to generate the spline.
Not sure if this issue will affect the evolution, but I will look into it more carefully.