This is a more complicated fix incorporating the change in PR-#32 for issue #31
This assumes there was a reason for preferring reading the partnum from devname instead of dev - it falls back to dev if not resolvable, and falls back to 1 (like the old get_partnum()) if nothing works out.
This is a more complicated fix incorporating the change in PR-#32 for issue #31
This assumes there was a reason for preferring reading the partnum from
devnameinstead ofdev- it falls back to dev if not resolvable, and falls back to 1 (like the oldget_partnum()) if nothing works out.