Open yacobyadmin opened 10 years ago
I understand the motivation for this, as it's very flexible, but I think it ultimately hurts code transparency. If we end up needing a ton of inputs to the constructors, I'd rather try to create a wrapper class that would make it explicit what the inputs are.
agreed! you might also imagine that we improve the experience of actually setting up a rack, and so that wrapper could be part of something bigger
I think default constructors for all objects (or maybe almost all) should take a struct with the properly named fields.