Open erenfro opened 1 year ago
Further investigations has provided some useful information on this. Apparently ID=fedora, is not the same as lsb_release -si's Fedora. Case problem.
Further investigations, this is a common issue overall. lsb_release -si
on Pop! OS shows Pop, but os-release is ID=pop
. Linux Mint is Linuxmint
and ID=linuxmint
-- So this seems to be a simple case comparison issue going on, and a good graceful way to do that would be to lowercase compare both the filename key and the detected distro value.
Describe the bug
On Fedora 38, which does not come with lsb_release by default, I noticed my ~/.gitconfig wasn't being linked, and was actively removing any manually linked files to ~/.gitconfig##d.Fedora, provided that redhat-lsb-core, which provides lsb_release, was not installed. It should, by the docs, revert to os-release, and it fails that as well.
To reproduce
Can this be reproduced with the yadm/testbed docker image: [Yes/No]
Unknown, I don't do docker.
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Create template alternative file for yadm, without having lsb_release installed, and run
yadm alt
.Expected behavior
yadm should properly investigate os-release and determine distro from ID, and apply it.
Environment
Additional context
This used to work, because I've used it many times before. Perhaps I had lsb_release, as well, but I'm sure not always.