Open yadunut opened 4 months ago
[IMPORTANT!: Please do not edit or reply to this comment using the GitHub UI. You can respond to it using CATcher during the next phase of the PE]
Thanks for the feedback, we decided to reset the filter because if lets say you edit the name, the person will disappear from the filtered list. In addition, we auto-select the edited person on executing the command.
Rectifying this issue (e.g. only resetting the filter if you edit a field that is being filtered) is less important (based on the value/effort considerations) than the work that has been done already, and this issue does not cause the application to crash. Hence, we think that this is not in scope.
Team chose [response.NotInScope
]
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your reason]
Steps to reproduce
pay
filter name pay
edit 1 p/81234567
Expected behaviour should be to maintain the filtered view so that I can run the same
edit 1 <params>
so that I can continue updating the same user if needed.