低调推下防止助纣为虐的人逍遥境外的投票

[GoogleCodeExporter]

#请各位童鞋注意和广传：
任何助长互联网审查、建立网络封锁墙的人，都应该被拒进��
�美国境内 
建立互联网的信息技术应该用于各国之间的沟通和知识交流��
�如果有人把这些技能和技术，用于阻止人们取得国外的互联�
��资讯，所有国家都应该抵制这种行为。
１．下面是白宫的官网，官方的投票。
２．投票需注册，超简单。只填一下邮箱和名字就可以。
３．这个投票的目的是：如果谁曾经叁与过互联网审查的相��
�工作，比如建***什么的。
４． SIGNATURES NEEDED BY FEBRUARY 24, 2013 TO REACH GOAL OF 
100,000。即说是今年2月24号前，如果投票人数没有达到100000，�
��个提议就真的只是意思一下而已。目前还需要93,445个投票。
作为一个负责任、重视自由的政府，是应该合理地拒绝这些��
�入境
快动手吧，一分钟而已～ 用某种方式向***复仇的机会来啦！
https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/people-who-help-internet-censorship-bu
ilders-great-firewall-china-example-should-be-denied-entry-us/5bzJkjCL
请投过票的通知在本页面下留言，我们会永远记住你。
-https://code.google.com/p/wwqgtxx-goagent/wiki/toupiao

我用apjp heroku上网看到goagent上这个wiki 
entry投了一票，目前只有七千多人。还需九万多票，景德镇内
以免费收费方式翻墙又懂英文的人有数百万吧，我觉得翻墙��
�折腾人了，投这个票小折腾一下又费什么力呢。

Original issue reported on code.google.com by Tintinch...@gmail.com on 28 Jan 2013 at 8:04

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Sorry, I made the decision to close this issue.

1. Issue is the place to create an issue for helping newer users answer their 
questions or fixing bugs to make this project better.

2. I do believe The GFW is no good for the world network, not just China 
itself. However, this SIGNATURE event would make little contribution to abolish 
the CENSORSHIP POLICY, and then there would be no hope to make any differences 
to the people who contribute to the GFW. Besides, it is so hard to make sure 
someone REALLY makes contributes to the GFW, except BinXing Fang, in addition, 
the SIGNATURE contents does NOT have a clear NAME list. What's worse, most 
Chinese people do not realize the existence of The GFW or just do not care 
about it at all.

3. Only hope would the day, most people realize that the CENSORSHIP POLICY 
makes much more side effects and would be abolished, and then there would be no 
more The GFW, come true. Self-consciousness waking up does not need the 
SIGNATURE things. Moreover, it is neither related to the U.S government, nor to 
other countries.

4. We should admit that China do have quite large population, which causes it 
is so easy to make a lot of STUPID COMMENT things, such as leaving flood 
comments after the posts of Barack Obama ( 
https://www.google.com/search?q=obama+plus+comment+china ), recently leaving 
large number useless marks on the issue of 12306_ticket_helper ( 
https://github.com/iccfish/12306_ticket_helper/issues/16 REMOVED ) and so.

5. This is just my opinion and not the author of APJP. He does not understand 
Chinese, and I am kind of like Chinese / English translator.

Original comment by goknmuse on 29 Jan 2013 at 10:46

• Changed state: Done

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Thanks for giving reasons to close the "issue". Though several points are 
debatable, I have little time in disposal to come into details. I will 
highlight only two points. American government may should not be involved in 
issues related to GFW, but why are GAE, dotcloud, openshift....involved in 
providing free web cloud service and net traffic for proxy usage? Aren't this 
abuse of their services? I do not imply here applications for circumventing Gfw 
have done anything wrong,  my point is that gfw involves not only netizens in 
china, but many side effects of it,even seemingly insignificant, have nuisible 
influences to things foreign to it . Secondly, an official blacklist(three 
people make a meagre list though) issuing from american government has some 
symblolique value, whatever its factial . GFW have restricted most chinese 
netizens to surf on a limited number of sites, like the effect of hukou to 
restrict chinese citizens to stay in their hometown, why not make designers of 
these regulations to have a little impression of such regulations in the case 
of themselves? 
I admit that this signature thing is poorly built and I agree your closing off 
my "issue" due to the reason that this doesn't count as an issue pertinent to 
apjp. In general, the signature thing itself is insignificant and stupid in 
some senses. I only wanna say one thing always have many aspects to see, I see 
a little value in this signature petition. Everyone has his/her opinion though.

Original comment by Tintinch...@gmail.com on 29 Jan 2013 at 2:03