Fix ParentObject.replace_preservica_tif(co)

[martinlovell]

ParentObject.replace_preservica_tif(co) copies all images to the same child OID. The last image is the one that ends up in child OID in the /data directory for all children.

See: https://github.com/yalelibrary/yul-dc-management/pull/1403/files#diff-acc421bf5477cf1667d0b61e9ded247f3b42335a2425020920d8c20919ff0384L293

[martinlovell]

https://github.com/yalelibrary/yul-dc-management/pull/1403

[K8Sewell]

Deployed to Test, Demo, and UAT with release v2.70.2 - however, UAT is connected to the Test Preservica instance rather than prod and the info object ending in fff5f5 is only available on prod.

Do we have an object in test preservica with some duplicates we can try this out on?

[sshetenhelm]

To clarify, do you mean an object ingested into TEST Preservica that has two copies of the exact same image, with the exact same filename?

[sshetenhelm]

Just asked our Digital Studio to ingest this object in TEST Preservica. I'll update when they do.

[sshetenhelm]

'Create parent' batch process in progress -- https://collections-uat.library.yale.edu/management/batch_processes/2052

[sshetenhelm]

Object uploaded successfully. Please note the repository added more files to this object, so it will now display as having 64 children instead of the original 38. Waiting on results of resync process now.

[sshetenhelm]

Successful? No longer running, unique children still displaying -- https://collections-uat.library.yale.edu/management/batch_processes/2055/parent_objects/901624363

Do we need to run any other tests for this?

[K8Sewell]

Testing with this object was the main thing we needed to check. Unless Martin has other test scenarios in mind - we are set.

[martinlovell]

We are all set as long as re-sync works with the right images in the right place.

[sshetenhelm]

Stakeholder stated they expected hundreds more images in this object. However, after investigating, we think this may be a stakeholder-to-Preservica workflow issue rather than a Preservica-to-DCS syncing issue. Let's keep this ticket and the next open for a little longer until we hear back from the stakeholder again.

[sshetenhelm]

Reconstructed Preservica object ingesting now -- https://collections-uat.library.yale.edu/management/batch_processes/2067

[sshetenhelm]

"New" object with 942 unique images successfully created. Pressed the "resync" button; we'll see what happens.