I tested this locally on the (private) repo where I noticed the problem. Let me know how you'd like additional tests to be added if needed. Also there might be further contexts that should be checked here; I haven't written much JS in a while so not sure.
Coverage remained the same at 76.963% when pulling 0dd89bf1441f94a36164d5b9e993ee0587a81728 on benkuhn:patch-1 into ccd6cdbff8a4db98d20da8ac1868558a45913005 on yamadapc:master.
Coverage remained the same at 76.963% when pulling 0dd89bf1441f94a36164d5b9e993ee0587a81728 on benkuhn:patch-1 into ccd6cdbff8a4db98d20da8ac1868558a45913005 on yamadapc:master.
Coverage remained the same at 76.963% when pulling 0dd89bf1441f94a36164d5b9e993ee0587a81728 on benkuhn:patch-1 into ccd6cdbff8a4db98d20da8ac1868558a45913005 on yamadapc:master.
Currently the following doctests are all silently ignored, which is surprising behavior:
This patch fixes that.
I tested this locally on the (private) repo where I noticed the problem. Let me know how you'd like additional tests to be added if needed. Also there might be further contexts that should be checked here; I haven't written much JS in a while so not sure.