Refactor `searchInPairs` and Enhance `rtrimLines` Functions

Mefisto04 commented 1 month ago

This pull request includes the following changes:

Refactored searchInPairs:
- Simplified the binary search logic for determining if a hashIndex falls within string literal pairs. This enhances code readability and maintainability.
Enhanced rtrimLines Function:
- Modified the implementation to utilize String.prototype.trimEnd() for trimming trailing whitespace from each line, improving performance and efficiency.

These changes aim to streamline the code while maintaining the existing functionality and ensuring that all tests pass successfully.

Summary by CodeRabbit

New Features
- Simplified methods for removing docstrings and hash comments in Python files, improving efficiency.
- Introduced a new function to manage the instantiation of file manipulators based on file extensions.
Refactor
- Enhanced clarity and maintainability of code by streamlining comment removal logic.
- Updated the line trimming method to improve readability and efficiency.
- Retained the CompositeManipulator class while restructuring manipulator instantiation and access.

coderabbitai[bot] commented 1 month ago

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces significant modifications to the PythonManipulator class in src/core/file/fileManipulate.ts. Key changes include a simplification of the removeHashComments method and a refactor of the rtrimLines function for improved readability. A new function, getOrCreateManipulator, has been added to handle the instantiation of manipulators based on file extensions, while the existing getFileManipulator function has been updated to utilize this new method. The CompositeManipulator class remains unchanged.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
src/core/file/fileManipulate.ts	- Simplified `removeDocStrings` method logic.
	- Simplified `removeHashComments` method by replacing binary search with a more concise approach.
	- Refactored `rtrimLines` function to use string manipulation instead of regex.
	- Added `getOrCreateManipulator` function for instantiating manipulators based on file extensions.
	- Updated `getFileManipulator` to utilize `getOrCreateManipulator` while maintaining its signature.

Possibly related PRs

81: This PR directly modifies the removeDocStrings and removeHashComments methods in the PythonManipulator class within the same file, src/core/file/fileManipulator.ts, indicating a strong connection to the changes made in the main PR.

📜 Recent review details

**Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI** **Review profile: CHILL**

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 013535495291ee352b8eed4051e2c7fda5a0cdb8 and 713cde31fc30da755cd077a13e65f2483fe1516e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

* src/core/file/fileManipulate.ts (4 hunks)

🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)

* src/core/file/fileManipulate.ts

--- Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

- [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)

🪧 Tips

### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit , please review it.` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](http://discord.gg/coderabbit) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.

yamadashy commented 1 month ago

@Mefisto04 Thank you for your quick implements!

However, it seems that the lint checks and tests are currently failing. Could you please take a look and address the following:

Resolve any lint errors. npm run lint
Fix the failing tests. npm run test

Thanks again for your contributions to improving Repopack's performance.

codecov[bot] commented 1 month ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 76.40%. Comparing base (6a0b2c4) to head (713cde3). Report is 11 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #122 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 76.57% 76.40% -0.18% ========================================== Files 36 36 Lines 1665 1653 -12 Branches 269 266 -3 ========================================== - Hits 1275 1263 -12 Misses 390 390 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Mefisto04 commented 1 month ago

yamadashy commented 1 month ago

I see that secretlint is throwing an error. Are you perhaps using Windows? It might be an issue with path separators.

Mefisto04 commented 1 month ago

@yamadashy yes, i am using windows. so what will be the approach to solve this ? Coz there is no issue in test when i run that

yamadashy commented 1 month ago

I've committed the lint fixes to your branch. Additionally, I've merged a fix into the main branch that addresses the issue with secretlint not running properly on Windows.

Let me know if you encounter any further issues.

yamadashy commented 1 month ago

Hi, @Mefisto04

The implementation is perfect, thank you so much! Your changes have significantly improved the code's readability and efficiency.

I'll merge this. Thank you for your contribution!

yamadashy / repomix