search

yamadashy / repomix

📦 Repomix (formerly Repopack) is a powerful tool that packs your entire repository into a single, AI-friendly file. Perfect for when you need to feed your codebase to Large Language Models (LLMs) or other AI tools like Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini.
MIT License
4.25k stars 195 forks source link

(Typo): Update README.md #145

Closed kaleaditya779 closed 1 week ago

kaleaditya779 commented 3 weeks ago

Corrected spellings of words and increased grammatical continuity.

These changes improve the quality of the documentations. They do not affect the system in any way.

stackblitz[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

Review PR in StackBlitz Codeflow Run & review this pull request in StackBlitz Codeflow.

coderabbitai[bot] commented 3 weeks ago
📝 Walkthrough ## Walkthrough The changes in this pull request focus on textual modifications in the `README.md` file to enhance clarity and consistency. Specific phrases have been reworded for better readability, and adjustments have been made to capitalization and terminology. Notably, terms such as "perfect" have been replaced with "Ideal," and "Contributing Guide" has been updated to "Contribution Guide." These modifications aim to improve the overall presentation of the document without altering any exported or public entities. ## Changes | File | Change Summary | |--------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | README.md | - Revised phrases for clarity (e.g., "perfect" to "Ideal").
- Adjusted capitalization (e.g., "AI-Optimized" to "AI-optimized").
- Enhanced readability (e.g., "You need just one command" to "You only need one command").
- Modified phrasing for packing files (e.g., "To pack" to "For packing").
- Changed "You can also use GitHub shorthand format" to "You can also use GitHub's shorthand format."
- Updated "Contributing Guide" to "Contribution Guide." | ## Possibly related PRs - **#99**: This PR also focuses on enhancing clarity and consistency in the `README.md`, similar to the changes made in the main PR. - **#100**: This PR involves textual modifications in the `README.md` aimed at improving clarity and readability, aligning with the objectives of the main PR. - **#111**: This PR updates the `README.md` to include references to glob patterns, which relates to the changes made in the main PR regarding packing specific files or directories. - **#114**: This PR enhances the `README.md` with updates to the contribution and license sections, which is relevant to the overall clarity and structure improvements seen in the main PR. - **#116**: This PR introduces a "Back to Top" button in the `README.md`, which complements the structural improvements made in the main PR. - **#117**: This PR adds a "Contributors" section and a "Back to Top" link in the `README.md`, enhancing the document's structure and readability, similar to the changes in the main PR.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)
🪧 Tips ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit , please review it.` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](http://discord.gg/coderabbit) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.
yamadashy commented 1 week ago

@kaleaditya779 Thank you for your contribution and attention to detail!

While your suggested changes might improve some of the English expressions, the current documentation is sufficiently clear and understandable. These changes are mostly stylistic preferences rather than actual corrections, and I prefer to keep the current wording to minimize maintenance overhead.

Thank you for understanding!

kaleaditya779 commented 1 week ago

@kaleaditya779 Thank you for your contribution and attention to detail!

While your suggested changes might improve some of the English expressions, the current documentation is sufficiently clear and understandable. These changes are mostly stylistic preferences rather than actual corrections, and I prefer to keep the current wording to minimize maintenance overhead.

Thank you for understanding!

Yea.. got the point. Thank you to you as well.