Closed glennhickey closed 3 years ago
On a slightly related note: I've noticed that abpoa can give quite different results when I do things like scale all the parameters up by the same value. Is this by design? Are there any maximums or hidden paramters that can affect this?
scale all the parameters up by the same value
How did you scale the parameters? Did you only scale the match/mismatch or all the scoring parameters?
Yan
Only a match score and mismatch penalty are available now. Would it be possible to allow specification of a full matrix? We would like to be able to, for example, use the default lastz scoring matrix referred to here: http://www.bx.psu.edu/~rsharris/lastz/README.lastz-1.04.03.html#options_scoring
As far as I can tell, this is just requires additional interface given that a full matrix seems to be used internally? Personally, I'm more interested in doing this via the C API than the command line, but I'm sure other users would like the option there too. Thanks!
This should be easy to update. I will work on that.
Thanks!
About the scaling being inconsistent: I was unable to reproduce an example to send you. I must have been mistaken when I thought I saw this happen. If I can find an example, I'll send it right away. In the meantime, sorry!
Check out the latest commit of abpoa (v1.2.2), which now takes a new parameter -t score.matrix
.
Thanks!!!
Only a match score and mismatch penalty are available now. Would it be possible to allow specification of a full matrix? We would like to be able to, for example, use the default lastz scoring matrix referred to here: http://www.bx.psu.edu/~rsharris/lastz/README.lastz-1.04.03.html#options_scoring
As far as I can tell, this is just requires additional interface given that a full matrix seems to be used internally? Personally, I'm more interested in doing this via the C API than the command line, but I'm sure other users would like the option there too. Thanks!