Hello, and thank you for sharing the codes! This paper is very interesting.
I also had one paper "Rethinking Few-shot 3D Point Cloud Semantic Segmentation" (Github link) accepted by CVPR2024. In it, we found that the current experimental setting has two significant issues. Especially, the current setting will leak the target class clues by the density difference between the sampled foreground and background points, which will make the few-shot problem much easier. And the scarcity of points in the current setup is also unrealistic. Then we propose a new, more reasonable experimental setting along with benchmarks for future fair evaluation. So, I would like to kindly inquire about what the performance of SegNN will be in the corrected few-shot setting, aming to help future researchers.
Hello, and thank you for sharing the codes! This paper is very interesting.
I also had one paper "Rethinking Few-shot 3D Point Cloud Semantic Segmentation" (Github link) accepted by CVPR2024. In it, we found that the current experimental setting has two significant issues. Especially, the current setting will leak the target class clues by the density difference between the sampled foreground and background points, which will make the few-shot problem much easier. And the scarcity of points in the current setup is also unrealistic. Then we propose a new, more reasonable experimental setting along with benchmarks for future fair evaluation. So, I would like to kindly inquire about what the performance of SegNN will be in the corrected few-shot setting, aming to help future researchers.
Thank you very much for the great work again!