Open yap-zong-xin opened 4 months ago
Accepted as a bug, but of VeryLow severity as it is a purely cosmetic documentation bug.
Team chose [severity.VeryLow
]
Originally [severity.Low
]
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
Description
Although your UG is very detailed, I personally feel that by explaining every single detail and showing the actual and expected output of even a very simple changes (splitting the command into smaller sub parts) made your UG hard to read.
For example, for the edit portion, the example for tags can be combined with the first one, and it will still be effective and convey how tags work in edit.
Both seems very similar: