./docs/source/index.rst says that the license for MISO is the "MIT/BSD license".
However, the file ./misopy/gff_utils.py is licensed under the GPLv2+. Likewise, ./pysplicing/src/random.c contain various functions that are licensed under the GPLv2+.
As a GPL-licensed work cannot be rereleased under a non-copyleft license such as the MIT or BSD licenses it is unclear what license the combined work is supposed to have. If ./misopy/gff_utils.py and ./pysplicing/src/random.c are an essential part of the combined work and cannot be excluded, should MISO as the combined work not also be released under the GPLv2+?
The license has been changed to GPLv2 to reflect this, since a portion of the code is not compatible with BSD. This has been clarified in documentation and pacakge.
./docs/source/index.rst
says that the license for MISO is the "MIT/BSD license".However, the file
./misopy/gff_utils.py
is licensed under the GPLv2+. Likewise,./pysplicing/src/random.c
contain various functions that are licensed under the GPLv2+.As a GPL-licensed work cannot be rereleased under a non-copyleft license such as the MIT or BSD licenses it is unclear what license the combined work is supposed to have. If
./misopy/gff_utils.py
and./pysplicing/src/random.c
are an essential part of the combined work and cannot be excluded, should MISO as the combined work not also be released under the GPLv2+?