Closed rneher closed 1 year ago
Yes, the codon reporting appears to be bugged. Notably, the actual translation is correct.
In the case of the second entry in this line, there is a A>T mutation in the first position, and a T>A mutation in the second position, simultaneously (if not in reality, then with respect to this tree). This causes a codon change ATT>TAT, which causes the single amino acid change I>Y (M:I217Y). This is correct if you look up protein translation tables online. The same applies for the third entry, which is GTA>GAC, leading to V>D.
What appears to be buggy is the reporting of the codon changes directly in the second to last column, as it reports ATT>TTT, disregarding the second mutation. This also appears to affect the third entry in the same way.
We will look into the incorrect codon reporting- thank you for raising this issue.
when running
matUtils
as followson the
protobuf
obtained from ucsc.edu, I find lines like in thetranslations
file (amino_acid_mutations.tsv
in my case)The two mutations in M are associated with two nucleotide changes each. But the associated codons only seem to reflect one change and don't match the amino acids.
I might be missing something, but it seems like a bug to me.