Open NkRMnZr opened 10 months ago
Right now XBB.1.9.7 is pulled under XBB.1.9.1 > C22995G(S:T478R) https://nextstrain.org/fetch/genome.ucsc.edu/trash/ct/subtreeAuspice48_genome_2627a_193950.json?label=id:node_6907450
C22995G(S:T478R)
Also XBB.1.9.1 > C22995G(S:T478R) is filled with some flip-flop, probably from some other lineages or dropouts, question is, could there be an actual undesignated S:T478R lineage right under XBB.1.9.1 polytomy?
S:T478R
https://nextstrain.org/fetch/genome.ucsc.edu/trash/ct/subtreeAuspice48_genome_2627a_193950.json?c=gt-S_478&label=id:node_6907450
Right now XBB.1.9.7 is pulled under XBB.1.9.1 >
C22995G(S:T478R)https://nextstrain.org/fetch/genome.ucsc.edu/trash/ct/subtreeAuspice48_genome_2627a_193950.json?label=id:node_6907450Also XBB.1.9.1 >
C22995G(S:T478R)is filled with some flip-flop, probably from some other lineages or dropouts, question is, could there be an actual undesignatedS:T478Rlineage right under XBB.1.9.1 polytomy?https://nextstrain.org/fetch/genome.ucsc.edu/trash/ct/subtreeAuspice48_genome_2627a_193950.json?c=gt-S_478&label=id:node_6907450