Closed Silverster98 closed 2 years ago
I have noticed that the IoU of Pix2Vox on ShapeNet is reported as 0.467 in your paper, but the value reported in the original paper is over 0.6. I don't find too much difference in the setting between AutoSDF and Pix2Vox. Can you explain more?
Hi,
We use the split provided in DISN so the number is different.
Thanks!
I have noticed that the IoU of Pix2Vox on ShapeNet is reported as 0.467 in your paper, but the value reported in the original paper is over 0.6. I don't find too much difference in the setting between AutoSDF and Pix2Vox. Can you explain more?