Closed LouisGariepy closed 1 year ago
Hi, thanks for pointing this out. In this case, what's the recommended practice? Having a LICENSE-MIT
and a LICENSE-APACHE
files? I see that in other repos they also replicate the license files in all crates.
The member crates are licensed under MIT according to their manifest, but it's good practice to also add a
LICENSE
file to the top-level of the repo, along with a notice in theREADME
file.Furthermore, I would recommend to license under
MIT/Apache-2.0
(instead of justMIT
) for compatibility with the wider Rust ecosystem.