Closed chiuhoward closed 2 months ago
Hello @chiuhoward! Thanks for updating this PR. We checked the lines you've touched for PEP 8 issues, and found:
There are currently no PEP 8 issues detected in this Pull Request. Cheers! :beers:
Maybe we could break this up into several tasks. One would be rumba_fit
which returns rumba_fit
. Another would be rumba_params
and that can return the shm params (so this would involve running rumba_fit.odf then extract_odf). then more could be rumba_f_wm
, rumba_f_gm
, etc... and these functions are one-liners that accept the rumba_fit and return that tissue property. These functions would have a similar structure to dti_ga
@arokem this is ready for review/merge
I think I addressed all of the changes and did the new merge correctly? =s @36000 @arokem
LGTM, Ariel?
Actually, now that I look at this, this also removed the refactoring I did so that we could use the SHM from disk from previous runs. Let me see If I can do this merge
I think this should be good to go! @chiuhoward look it over and make sure i didnt delete any changes u made recently.
@36000 looks good! suffixes and docstrings were all that I changed and they’re there
OK, once the docs finish I will merge, unless @arokem has any more comments. overall, good work everyone!
Yeah - looks great! When you get a chance, maybe you can write a PR that has an example? @36000 showed me some really impressive tissue type maps from this model using the Stanford HARDI dataset. Might be nice to show slices from these as part of that.
Tried to add RUMBA-SD based on https://docs.dipy.org/stable/examples_built/fiber_tracking/tracking_rumba.html and https://docs.dipy.org/stable/reference/dipy.reconst.html#dipy.reconst.rumba.RumbaSDModel