Open gwtfight opened 1 month ago
Yeah that's a good question. Actually I had tested it on my haplotype resolved assemblies, and found the same case. The reason behind this is mapping reads to diploid genome would result in lower mapping quality (not just the mapq value) in homologous regions and some other problematic regions. And please remember GCI always keep the highest quality reads mappings, so in above diploid genome case, GCI would discard lots of alignments and get much lower scores. Therefore, as in the document, I always recommend mapping reads on each haplotype and using GCI to evaluate.
Thank you very much for your response and advice. I wish you a pleasant life.
I assembled two haplotype-resolved T2T genomes. When I followed your suggestion to set the parameters and combined the two haplotype genomes into a single FA file for evaluation using GCI, the score was significantly lower. However, when I evaluated the two haplotype genomes separately, the scores were much better. I only used HiFi data for the assembly. Do you know what might be causing this?