Closed Shane-XB-Qian closed 1 week ago
Why "abbr" and "dup" fields are removed from the key?
-- shane.xb.qian
Why "abbr" and "dup" fields are removed from the key?
- had 'word' already, - 'dup' maybe all same val.
it is better to keep abbr
and dup
to make sure there are no duplicates.
Note that a completion item may have abbr
in addition to word
.
Why "abbr" and "dup" fields are removed from the key?
- had 'word' already, - 'dup' maybe all same val.
it is better to keep
abbr
anddup
to make sure there are no duplicates. Note that a completion item may haveabbr
in addition toword
.
i think should think about 'overhead', should not put too much things to make up a huge 'key'; that functionality was trying to remove dup compl items, how come 'abbr' was a matter to that?
-- shane.xb.qian
Please do not remove dup
. If LSP sends a snippet back and if the abbr
or word
matches a buffer word completion or vsnip completion, it will not show.
Please do not remove
dup
.
remove where? if you meant in that compl items itself, then it should not and would not.
If LSP sends a snippet back and if the
abbr
orword
matches a buffer word completion or vsnip completion, it will not show.
are they same kind? was this really the problem?