Use proper generics in `ForEach`

[andreoss]

• Fix generics in ForEach

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #1610 (96cc063) into master (c0c5874) will increase coverage by 0.01%. The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #1610      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     90.13%   90.14%   +0.01%     
- Complexity     1613     1615       +2     
============================================
  Files           302      302              
  Lines          3780     3784       +4     
  Branches        121      121              
============================================
+ Hits           3407     3411       +4     
  Misses          339      339              
  Partials         34       34              

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ	Complexity Δ
src/main/java/org/cactoos/proc/ForEach.java	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)	2.00 <1.00> (ø)
src/main/java/org/cactoos/proc/BiProcOf.java	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)	9.00% <0.00%> (+2.00%)

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data Powered by Codecov. Last update c0c5874...96cc063. Read the comment docs.

[victornoel]

@0crat status

[0crat]

@0crat status (here)

@victornoel This is what I know about this job in C63314D6Z, as in §32:

• The job #1610 is not in scope
• Job footprint (restricted area)

[victornoel]

@0crat in

[0crat]

@victornoel/z everybody who has role REV is banned at #1610; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[victornoel]

@andreoss see my latest comment: the objective is to have tests that will ensure us the generic variance is working as expected when writing normal Java relying on the inference from the compiler for generics.

[0crat]

@victornoel/z everybody who has role REV is banned at #1610; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[victornoel]

@rultor merge

[rultor]

@rultor merge

@victornoel OK, I'll try to merge now. You can check the progress of the merge here

[rultor]

@rultor merge

@victornoel Done! FYI, the full log is here (took me 9min)

[0crat]

@victornoel/z everybody who has role REV is banned at #1610; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[0crat]

@victornoel/z everybody who has role REV is banned at #1610; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[victornoel]

@0crat status

[0crat]

@0crat status (here)

@victornoel This is what I know about this job in C63314D6Z, as in §32:

• The job #1610 is not in scope
• Job footprint (restricted area)