Closed mcondarelli closed 1 year ago
Is there any reason preventing usage of (de facto) standard syntax for PlantUML inclusion using fencing?
I mean: Why use
{% plantuml %} @startuml ... @enduml {% endplantuml %}
instead of:
```puml @startuml ... @enduml ```
Could this be considered in future updates?
@mcondarelli I believe, both options would work just fine. I just added a test for it: 7366d3b
Is there any reason preventing usage of (de facto) standard syntax for PlantUML inclusion using fencing?
I mean: Why use
instead of:
Could this be considered in future updates?