architect per command

[yegor256]

architect option should work on a command level.

At the moment, there is only one way to define "architects" in the project:

architects:
  - yegor256
  - jeff

See how it's done here, for example: https://github.com/yegor256/rultor/blob/1.60.1/.rultor.yml#L13-L15

That's not enough. We should let it possible to define architects per commands:

deploy:
  architects:
    - yegor256
    - jeff

I believe, we just should use QnByArchitect a few more times here: https://github.com/yegor256/rultor/blob/1.60.1/src/main/java/com/rultor/agents/Agents.java#L291-L328 We need to use it not only for all commands, but also per each command, with specific XPath. The question here is how to test that it all works. I would suggest to move this static method Agents#commands() into its own class and create a unit test for it.

[alex-palevsky]

this task will get someone's attention soon

[alex-palevsky]

@yegor256 it is your task now,go ahead

[alex-palevsky]

@yegor256 many thanks for the report, I topped your account for 15 mins, transaction 000-1c7caeca

[alex-palevsky]

@yegor256 milestone set to 0.3 (correct me if I am wrong)

[yegor256]

@alex-palevsky assign someone else pls

[alex-palevsky]

@alex-palevsky assign someone else pls

@yegor256 -30 points to your rating :(

[alex-palevsky]

@alex-palevsky assign someone else pls

@yegor256 no problem, I will try to find somebody else

[dmzaytsev]

@yegor256 sorry, I can't right now I don't know the details of the project, it will take too much time

[alex-palevsky]

@kujtimiihoxha it's yours now, please proceed keeping in mind our principles. Feel free to ask any technical questions right here in the ticket

The budget of this issue is 30 mins, which is exactly how much will be paid when the task is done (see this for explanation)

[kujtimiihoxha]

@yegor256 please give further information about the issue, also see #986

[kujtimiihoxha]

@alex-palevsky waiting for #986

[alex-palevsky]

@alex-palevsky waiting for #986

@kujtimiihoxha right, let's wait for #986

[yegor256]

@kujtimiihoxha I updated the description of the ticket, let me know if that's enough

[alex-palevsky]

@yegor256 FYI, the issue we were waiting for (#986) is fixed

[kujtimiihoxha]

@alex-palevsky assign someone else

[alex-palevsky]

@alex-palevsky assign someone else

@kujtimiihoxha 30 points deducted from your rating

[alex-palevsky]

@alex-palevsky assign someone else

@kujtimiihoxha right, I'll try to find someone else for this task

[original-brownbear]

@alex-palevsky this is postponed.

[alex-palevsky]

@alex-palevsky this is postponed.

@original-brownbear thanks, I added "postponed" label

[alex-palevsky]

@alex-palevsky this is postponed.

@original-brownbear OK, I will try to assign someone else