search

yegor256 / tacit

CSS framework for dummies, without a single CSS class: nicely renders properly formatted HTML5 pages
https://yegor256.github.io/tacit/
MIT License
1.71k stars 91 forks source link

CDN link seems broken for some variations #194

Open filfreire opened 5 years ago

filfreire commented 5 years ago

It seems for some versions of the CDN link, we're not pointing to the latest released version, example:

https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/yegor256/tacit@gh-pages/tacit-css.min.css

Points to:

/*# sourceMappingURL=tacit-css-1.3.9.min.css.map */

While https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/yegor256/tacit@gh-pages/tacit.min.css

Points to:

/*# sourceMappingURL=tacit-css-1.4.1.min.css.map */
0crat commented 5 years ago

Job #194 is now in scope, role is DEV

0crat commented 5 years ago

Bug was reported, see §29: +15 point(s) just awarded to @filfreire/z

0crat commented 5 years ago

@filfreire/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #194; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

MartinKolarik commented 5 years ago

@filfreire please check now. We had some @branch URLs incorrectly cached at the CDN level for longer than they were supposed to be.

0crat commented 5 years ago

@filfreire/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #194; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

0crat commented 5 years ago

@filfreire/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #194; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

0crat commented 5 years ago

@filfreire/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #194; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

0crat commented 5 years ago

@filfreire/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #194; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

0crat commented 5 years ago

@filfreire/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #194; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

0crat commented 5 years ago

@filfreire/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #194; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

0crat commented 5 years ago

@filfreire/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #194; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

0crat commented 5 years ago

@filfreire/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #194; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

0crat commented 5 years ago

@filfreire/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #194; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

0crat commented 5 years ago

@filfreire/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #194; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

0crat commented 5 years ago

@filfreire/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #194; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)