For #77: Errors page and tests.

[paulodamaso]

For #77:

• Created error take and page;
• Added tests;
• Added fake classes for testing
• Left puzzle for error delete implementation

[0crat]

Job #80 is now in scope, role is REV

[0crat]

This pull request #80 is assigned to @pinaf/z, here is why; the budget is 15 minutes, see §4; please, read §27 and when you decide to accept the changes, inform @carlosmiranda/z (the architect) right in this ticket; if you decide that this PR should not be accepted ever, also inform the architect; this blog post will help you understand what is expected from a code reviewer; there will be a monetary reward for this job

[paulodamaso]

@pinaf ping

[paulodamaso]

@pinaf Please take a look. I've decided to use FkError for testing the page because implementing it to accept values would become too close to Error.Simple implementation made in https://github.com/yegor256/wring/issues/76, and I don't want to duplicate this code.

[pinaf]

@paulodamaso thanks, it looks good. @carlosmiranda good to merge.

[carlosmiranda]

@rultor merge

[rultor]

@rultor merge

@carlosmiranda OK, I'll try to merge now. You can check the progress of the merge here

[rultor]

@rultor merge

@carlosmiranda Done! FYI, the full log is here (took me 14min)

[0crat]

@ypshenychka/z please review this job completed by @pinaf/z, as in §30; the job will be fully closed and all payments will be made when the quality review is completed

[0crat]

The job #80 is now out of scope

[0crat]

Payment to ARC for a closed pull request, as in §28: +10 point(s) just awarded to @carlosmiranda/z

[ypshenychka]

@pinaf According to our QA Rules:

The code reviewer found at least three problems in the code. Comments were mostly about design problems, not cosmetic issues.

Only two issues were found during code review. Please confirm that you'll try to find at least three major problems while future reviews.

[pinaf]

@ypshenychka I confirm

[ypshenychka]

@pinaf thanks

[ypshenychka]

@0crat quality acceptable

[0crat]

Order was finished, quality is "acceptable": +15 point(s) just awarded to @pinaf/z

[0crat]

Quality review completed: +8 point(s) just awarded to @ypshenychka/z