For #82: Introduce deletion of errors.

paulodamaso commented 6 years ago

added TkErrorDelete endpoint for error deletion;
wired TkErrorDelete in TkApp;
corrected TkErrors.source method;
corrected DyErrorITCase / DyErrorsITCase tests

0crat commented 6 years ago

Job #84 is now in scope, role is REV

paulodamaso commented 6 years ago

@0crat status

0crat commented 6 years ago

@0crat status (here)

@paulodamaso This is what I know about this job in C7FCB1EQN, as in §32:

The job #84 is in scope for 2days
The role is REV
The job is not assigned to anyone
The budget is not set yet
These users are banned and won't be assigned:
- @paulodamaso/z: This user reported the ticket
Job footprint (restricted area)

carlosmiranda commented 6 years ago

@0crat assign @pinaf

0crat commented 6 years ago

@0crat assign @pinaf (here)

@carlosmiranda @carlosmiranda/z not enough funds available in the project, can't set budget of job #84, see §21; @pinaf/z will get no money on completion; in order to fix that, add funds to the project and assign the job again

0crat commented 6 years ago

Manual assignment of issues is discouraged, see §19: -5 point(s) just awarded to @carlosmiranda/z

paulodamaso commented 6 years ago

@carlosmiranda Would you kindly review and merge this one? This task is preventing me from receiving another tasks due to a full agenda, and I have submitted it almost a month ago.

paulodamaso commented 5 years ago

@carlosmiranda ping

paulodamaso commented 5 years ago

@carlosmiranda Done, please take a look

carlosmiranda commented 5 years ago

@rultor merge

rultor commented 5 years ago

@rultor merge

@carlosmiranda OK, I'll try to merge now. You can check the progress of the merge here

rultor commented 5 years ago

@rultor merge

@carlosmiranda Done! FYI, the full log is here (took me 18min)

0crat commented 5 years ago

Job #84 is not in the agenda of @pinaf/z, can't retrieve data and time of add

0crat commented 5 years ago

Job #84 is not in the agenda of @pinaf/z, can't inspect

0crat commented 5 years ago

Code review was too long (20 days), architects (@carlosmiranda) were penalized, see §55

0crat commented 5 years ago

The job #84 is now out of scope

0crat commented 5 years ago

There is an unrecoverable failure on my side. Please, submit it here:

PID: 4@041da5f8-f9e0-45ec-8176-7f0140d878bb, thread: AsyncProc-4
com.zerocracy.farm.reactive.StkRuntime[76] java.lang.IllegalStateException: org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.InvokerInvocationException in com.zerocracy.stk.pm.cost.funding.send_zold
org.codehaus.groovy.reflection.CachedMethod[105] org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.InvokerInvocationException: groovy.lang.MissingMethodException: No signature of method: com.zerocracy.pmo.banks.Zold.pay() is applicable for argument types: (java.lang.String, com.zerocracy.cash.Cash$S, java.lang.String) values: [carlosmiranda, $5.00, none]
Possible solutions: pay(java.lang.String, com.zerocracy.cash.Cash, java.lang.String, java.lang.String), any(), wait(), find(), dump(), grep()
org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.ScriptBytecodeAdapter[71] groovy.lang.MissingMethodException: No signature of method: com.zerocracy.pmo.banks.Zold.pay() is applicable for argument types: (java.lang.String, com.zerocracy.cash.Cash$S, java.lang.String) values: [carlosmiranda, $5.00, none]
Possible solutions: pay(java.lang.String, com.zerocracy.cash.Cash, java.lang.String, java.lang.String), any(), wait(), find(), dump(), grep()

0.39.6: CID: 726ac397-e362-4f6a-beb9-4878cf41cb55, Type: "Send zold"

0crat commented 5 years ago

Payment to ARC for a closed pull request, as in §28: +10 point(s) just awarded to @carlosmiranda/z

ypshenychka commented 5 years ago

@0crat status

0crat commented 5 years ago

@0crat status (here)

@ypshenychka This is what I know about this job in C7FCB1EQN, as in §32:

The job #84 is not in scope
The job is waiting quality review verdict by @ypshenychka/z for 3days
@pinaf/z will receive 30 minutes after quality review
Job footprint (restricted area)

ypshenychka commented 5 years ago

@carlosmiranda According to our QA Rules:

The code reviewer found at least three problems in the code. Comments were mostly about design problems, not cosmetic issues.

Only one issue was found during code review. Please confirm that you'll try to find at least three major problems while future reviews.

carlosmiranda commented 5 years ago

@ypshenychka this wasn't assigned to any reviewer for funding reasons, so quality should be "bad"

ypshenychka commented 5 years ago

@carlosmiranda got it, thanks

ypshenychka commented 5 years ago

@0crat quality bad

0crat commented 5 years ago

Quality is low, no payment, see §31

0crat commented 5 years ago

@0crat quality bad (here)

@ypshenychka The project doesn't have enough funds, can't make a payment

0crat commented 5 years ago

Quality review completed: +8 point(s) just awarded to @ypshenychka/z

yegor256 / wring

For #82: Introduce deletion of errors. #84