yekigoc / rosjava

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/rosjava
0 stars 0 forks source link

create-project.sh says "--target 11" which is invalid for me #4

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. roscd rosjava/android/library
2. ./create_project.sh

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?

Expected output looks something like this:

Updated default.properties
Updated local.properties
File build.xml is too old and needs to be updated.
Updated file build.xml
Updated file proguard.cfg

Actual output is this:

Error: Target id '11' is not valid. Use 'android list targets' to get the 
target ids.

Here is the output of 'android list targets':

Available Android targets:
id: 1 or "android-3"
     Name: Android 1.5
     Type: Platform
     API level: 3
     Revision: 4
     Skins: QVGA-P, HVGA-P, QVGA-L, HVGA-L, HVGA (default)
id: 2 or "android-4"
     Name: Android 1.6
     Type: Platform
     API level: 4
     Revision: 3
     Skins: QVGA, HVGA, WVGA854, WVGA800 (default)
id: 3 or "android-7"
     Name: Android 2.1-update1
     Type: Platform
     API level: 7
     Revision: 2
     Skins: QVGA, WQVGA400, HVGA, WVGA854, WQVGA432, WVGA800 (default)
id: 4 or "android-8"
     Name: Android 2.2
     Type: Platform
     API level: 8
     Revision: 2
     Skins: QVGA, WQVGA400, HVGA, WVGA854, WQVGA432, WVGA800 (default)
id: 5 or "android-9"
     Name: Android 2.3.1
     Type: Platform
     API level: 9
     Revision: 2
     Skins: QVGA, WQVGA400, HVGA, WVGA854, WQVGA432, WVGA800 (default)
id: 6 or "android-10"
     Name: Android 2.3.3
     Type: Platform
     API level: 10
     Revision: 1
     Skins: QVGA, WQVGA400, HVGA, WVGA854, WQVGA432, WVGA800 (default)
id: 7 or "android-11"
     Name: Android 3.0
     Type: Platform
     API level: 11
     Revision: 1
     Skins: WXGA (default)

Same problem happens in rosjava/android/tutorials/create_project.sh.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by he...@gmail.com on 8 Jun 2011 at 9:53

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
This issue was closed by revision 160e8c671aa7.

Original comment by damonkoh...@google.com on 9 Jun 2011 at 7:04