[Road Map] New Release

[UlisesGascon]

Hi all!

I opened this issue to keep tracking and an open discussion about the next release features and priorities.

New features & refactors

• [x] Upgrade outdated dependencies in the generated project PR:#762
• [x] Upgrade outdated dependencies in the generator PR:#760
• [ ] Let's improve testing in the generated project
  • [x] Improve the prompt message from Mocha generator #545
  • [x] Allow no test-framework to be used #457
  • [ ] Refactor Jasmine (remove sub-generator)
  • [ ] Refactor Mocha (remove sub-generator)
  • [x] Add jest support #615
  • [ ] Add ava support #521
  • [x] Add Cypress support for e2e testing
• [ ] Let's add a readme.md in generated project with relevant info (tasks, etc..) #587
• [ ] Add support to CLI no-interaction install #567 & #458

Bugs to be fixed

• [ ] Even though Yarn is detected, it creates a npm lockfile #747
• [x] Husky tasks needs to be compatible with NPM and Yarn PR:#761
• [x] Update travis.yml in order to remove compatibility with Node@6 and add support for Node@12. Test fall with yarn PR:#761

[UlisesGascon]

I will open a PR for the testing part soon, also for dependencies ;-)

[UlisesGascon]

@silvenon .. what do you think about this testing workflow? Open to discussion for all of you as well! 😉

I will improve the Unit testing with a real testing example (Mocha, Jest, Ava & Jasmine), as well I will cover the example with Cypress for e2e.

Note: You can ignore the creation files log, as this is only a test for the workflow and not a real implementation yet

[silvenon]

Btw, I updated the name of the milestone to v4.0.0 because so far we have pre-releases, which means that the next stable release will be v4.0.0.

[silvenon]

what do you think about this testing workflow?

I like it!

[UlisesGascon]

Awesome! v4.0 then :-)

I will prepare the PR asap 🎉

[silvenon]

@UlisesGascon could you explain these two tasks?

• [ ] Refactor Jasmine (remove sub-generator)
• [ ] Refactor Mocha (remove sub-generator)

Are they referring to a discussion we had somewhere?

[silvenon]

I'd also remove the AVA task for v4.0.0 and leave it for v4.1.0, if you agree. Because it's a new feature that requires creating a new generator, and since this doesn't appear to be a highly requested feature I suggest not blocking a stable release of generator-webapp because of this.

[UlisesGascon]

@silvenon and interested people... can we move the discussion to PR #763? I think that it will be easier to discuss with some code ^^