Closed Carl-71 closed 8 years ago
The program does not keep track of which sentinels are online. It tallies votes received when sentinels explicitly vote yes or no. It then calculates which is majority. I understand your suggestion Carl but it cannot be implemented in the current form of the software, as far as I know
Exactly as stated by previous comment, with an additoon :
An AFK "sentinel" results in a ruined day.
Issue is closed.
With the change from public to sentinel voting taken up in issue 2. Rather than a majority vote would it be more valuable to accept the sentinel call vote + one other sentinel yes as a valid reason to allow kick/ban. Rather than a minority vote would it be more valuable to accept the sentinel call vote + no other sentinel yes as a valid reason to not allow kick/ban.
As we are looking at sentinels making the vote and they are picked as trusted players who will make the right call. This may work better as we may not always have 3 or 4 sentinels online to create a majority.
This is more of a suggestion than issue, not sure if it could work with the code you have.