Closed ThomasNorr closed 2 years ago
Hi! We had no particular reason -- I think we were just trying to match previous work which used InceptionV3.
Thanks for the answer. Do you by any chance have tried resnet50 and have some hyperparameters/results for them? I am trying to compare my work to yours on the basis of resnet50 too, as a lot of the competitors have used that (and my method seems to be benefit from resnet).
Additionally, I think there is an error in CUB/scripts/experiment.sh: For the third seed of the joint model with lambda=0.01 the scheduler step is 20 instead of 1000
Oh, thank you for catching that error! I've fixed it. I'm sorry but we didn't try resnet50, so we don't have any hyperparameters or results for them.
Hello,
thanks for your interesting work. I was wondering why you chose InceptionV3 for the experiments on CUB rather than Resnet18/50 which seems to be more common in the literature?
I am grateful for some help. Greetings