yewstack / docs

https://yew.rs
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
45 stars 46 forks source link

'Events' vs 'Callbacks' in the documentation #76

Open rlasjunies opened 4 years ago

rlasjunies commented 4 years ago

'Callback' word could be confusing and is used for different concepts in Yew, Events seems to be easier to understand in the domain of HTML component interaction

The documentation may be improved with a structure inspired by the one of StencilJS.com ( there is some similarity between the projects)

Could be something like:

...

Components

Events:

Nested components

i feel this subject should be extracted from html! section

Styling

i feel this subject should be extracted from more section even if there is not a lot to say for now.

  • static CSS file
  • dev feedbacks; use of CSSinRust
  • official support in Yew under analysis ... #533
teymour-aldridge commented 4 years ago

I'm not sure that the derive macro should be just a "good to know" because you shouldn't try to implement Properties manually for a type.

rlasjunies commented 4 years ago

I put it their because it in in the current documentation. I take the remark, of course you will revise the documentation update. I currently drafting the proposal. Writing I am already adjusting the proposal made initially I hope I will have something to propose in the afternoon.

rlasjunies commented 4 years ago

Finally I've something I feel confortable for newbies like me. The current proposal looks like this:

  1. Components 8.1. Internal State 8.2. Trap events 8.3. Properties 8.4. Emit events 8.5. Nested component 8.6. Refs 8.7. Styling 8.8. Life cycle

I did my best to be sure, I do not loose previous information. Please let me know what you think.

rlasjunies commented 4 years ago

@jstarry @teymour-aldridge I've created a dummy projects to tests the example before to put in the documentation. you could find here https://github.com/rlasjunies/yew-doc-examples

If you are interested we can put it in the Yew/stack

rlasjunies commented 4 years ago

@teymour-aldridge

I'm not sure that the derive macro should be just a "good to know" because you shouldn't try to implement Properties manually for a type.

Please check if the documentation is correct in regard of your comment. Mainly in the chapter 'Properties'