Closed mariolew closed 6 years ago
Hi, thanks for your interest in our work.
My test procedure are: Testing AFLW2000 images and only recording the time of the forwarding of PRN(as described in the paper), then calculate the mean time(ignoring the first two value). The result is, 9.8ms with a single 1080, I also tested it in other GPUs: ~10ms with TITAN X(pascal) and ~25ms with K40.
So, please make sure:
prn.net_forward
. (It seems you record the time of prn.process
, which contains other parts like detection, cropping and transformation)net_forward
in each iteration.(other codes have a little influence on the speed)On 1080 Ti, I get around 0.01s for testing prn.net_forward
. It's little wiered that 1080 is faster than TITAN xp.
I am also curious about the 1080 vs TITAN X speed. Why is the TITAN X not faster?
Hi, nice work. I've tried the demo, however, I didn't get the speed reported in the paper, the average time to detect the test images is 100ms per image, my GPU is tesla K80 and I think the GPU is powerful enough.