Closed realratchet closed 10 months ago
In case there isn't a way to do this currently, how about something like a bang operator.
template toBangArg(inNode: NimNode, plainArgs: NimNode, kwArgs: NimNode) =
var node: NimNode
if inNode.kind == nnkPar:
node = inNode[0]
else:
node = inNode
if node.kind == nnkHiddenStdConv and node[0].kind == nnkEmpty:
discard
elif node.kind == nnkExprEqExpr or node.kind == nnkAsgn or node.kind == nnkExprColonExpr:
kwArgs.add(newTree(nnkPar,
newCall("cstring", newLit($node[0])),
newCall("toPyObjectArgument", node[1])))
else:
plainArgs.add(newCall("toPyObjectArgument", node))
macro `!`*(o: PyObject, args: varargs[untyped]): PyObject =
expectKind(o, nnkSym)
let plainArgs = newTree(nnkBracket)
let kwArgs = newTree(nnkBracket)
expectKind(args, nnkArgList)
expectLen(args, 1)
if args[0].kind == nnkTupleConstr:
for arg in args[0]:
toBangArg(arg, plainArgs, kwArgs)
else:
toBangArg(args[0], plainArgs, kwArgs)
result = newCall(bindSym"newPyObjectConsumingRef",
newCall(bindSym"callObjectAux", newDotExpr(o, newIdentNode("rawPyObj")), plainArgs, kwArgs))
This would allow the object to be called like this discard tqdm!(nil, desc: "column", total: 5)
I wanted to make it work like this discard tqdm!(nil, desc="column", total=5)
but it seems that nim has issue parsing macros with multiple kwargs if no arg is passed, e.g., discard tqdm!(desc="column", total=5)
doesn't compile. However, the colon does align nim's constructor style.
If you think this is completely stupid, no problem, I can always work around this on my own. If you think this is something worth pursuing, I can make a PR.
Hey I've encountered a bug with nimpy caused by nimlang templating. Is there a work around other than passing the arguments as variables?