search

yhoriuchi / projoint

A package for a more general, more straightforward, and more creative conjoint analysis
https://yhoriuchi.github.io/projoint/
Other
10 stars 0 forks source link

Revise 03. Predict the intra-respondent reliability (IRR) #18

Closed yhoriuchi closed 1 year ago

yhoriuchi commented 1 year ago

We should use summary() and plot(). Do we need print() for predict_tau()?

aaronrkaufman commented 1 year ago

I don't understand -- do you want me to remove the print() method? Is that it?

yhoriuchi commented 1 year ago

I don't quite understand the merit of print() for predict_tau(). Users only want to show the estimated IRR and plot the figure. Wha does print() do?

On Sun, Aug 13, 2023 at 2:02 PM Aaron R. Kaufman @.***> wrote:

I don't understand -- do you want me to remove the print() method? Is that it?

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/yhoriuchi/projoint/issues/18#issuecomment-1676425681, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AC332BE4ZB4YHNFUY7ROZQLXVEJCNANCNFSM6AAAAAA3OY6UWE . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>

aaronrkaufman commented 1 year ago

We can definitely remove it, but we can also keep it in if we decide to expand on it later. Currently, it is not harmful and it contains different information from summary()

yhoriuchi commented 1 year ago

OK! Then, can you revise the vignette and close this issue?

On Sun, Aug 13, 2023 at 2:09 PM Aaron R. Kaufman @.***> wrote:

We can definitely remove it, but we can also keep it in if we decide to expand on it later. Currently, it is not harmful and it contains different information from summary()

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/yhoriuchi/projoint/issues/18#issuecomment-1676427152, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AC332BEZA5B34B2UENRA7XLXVEJ4BANCNFSM6AAAAAA3OY6UWE . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>