Open cheng0712 opened 7 years ago
Mapping is done only once on the index read, each read in R1 and R2 are assigned to a file according to the mapping. So, I don't know why you got error. Could be a bug. I'd try
idemp -b map.txt -I1 lane1_NoIndex_L001_R2_001.fastq.gz -R1 lane1_NoIndex_L001_R1_001.fastq.gz -m 2 -o lane1/
idemp -b map.txt -I1 lane1_NoIndex_L001_R2_001.fastq.gz -R2 lane1_NoIndex_L001_R3_001.fastq.gz -m 2 -o lane1/
to see whether you could get correct results. It seems you have Hiseq. I haven't tested it on that platform. So, results could be totally wrong.
It is ATAC-seq data. There is no difference between your codes and mine. BTW, what is your definition of mismatch? Partially matched?
It's hard to know what went wrong without a piece of you data to reproduce the error. Mismatch includes base pair mismatch, deletion, insertion.
Hi, I have Hiseq data and I am having the same problem. Have you already tested idemp with Hiseq data? Are you planning to test it?
MiSeq only. It won't work on Hiseq.
Hi,
I have some paired end data, and I get the demultiplexed fastq files by the following command: _idemp -b map.txt -I1 lane1_NoIndex_L001_R2_001.fastq.gz -R1 lane1_NoIndex_L001_R1_001.fastq.gz -R2 lane1_NoIndex_L001_R3001.fastq.gz -m 2 -o lane1/
But I am surprised to see some samples have outputs of unequal size fastq files. Are you matching the barcodes with the forward reads and reverse reads separately or simultaneously?
Thanks, Cheng