Closed soarqin closed 5 years ago
so the order matters ?
yeah, confirmed. Or you can pick an old version vita-headers to resolve the problem
I'm against the idea of having to modify project to workaround SDK bugs introduced after the project has been stable.
On this special case, the most stable is taihen and not vitasdk function names confusions. So I agree, fix the vitasdk and don't touch taihen.
I'm against the idea of having to modify project to workaround SDK bugs introduced after the project has been stable.
Agree, this is just a temporary solution for latest vitasdk, before upstream fixes done from vitasdk maintainers. Close this, hope they'd get a new naming rule to resolve conflict asap.
See vitasdk/vita-headers#400