yihong1120 / traffic_report_front_flutter

A platform, 'Traffic-Violation-Report-System', enabling users in Taiwan to upload and share responses from law enforcement to traffic violations. This system aims for greater transparency in traffic law enforcement. It utilises Django for backend and Flutter for a separated frontend web development.
GNU Affero General Public License v3.0
0 stars 0 forks source link

[Sweep Rules] Add docstring to function in report_list_screen.dart #91

Closed sweep-ai[bot] closed 6 months ago

sweep-ai[bot] commented 6 months ago

PR Feedback (click)

Summary of Changes

Please review and merge this PR. Thank you!

sweep-ai[bot] commented 6 months ago

Rollback Files For Sweep

sweep-ai[bot] commented 6 months ago
Sweeping Fixing PR: track the progress here.

I'm currently fixing this PR to address the following:

[Sweep GHA Fix] The GitHub Actions run failed with the following error logs: ``` The command: Run flutter test yielded the following error: ##[error]0 tests passed, 1 failed. ##[error]Process completed with exit code 1. Here are the logs: ##[group]❌ Counter increments smoke test (failed) ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── │ #0 _HomeMapPageState._loadMarkers (package:traffic_report_front_flutter/screens/map/home_map.dart:72:16) │ #1  ├┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄ │ ⛔ Failed to load markers. Status code: 400 └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── ══╡ EXCEPTION CAUGHT BY FLUTTER TEST FRAMEWORK ╞════════════════════════════════════════════════════ The following TestFailure was thrown running a test: Expected: exactly one matching candidate Actual: _TextWidgetFinder: Which: means none were found but one was expected When the exception was thrown, this was the stack: #4 main. (file:///home/runner/work/traffic_report_front_flutter/traffic_report_front_flutter/test/widget_test.dart:19:5) #5 testWidgets.. (package:flutter_test/src/widget_tester.dart:168:15) #6 TestWidgetsFlutterBinding._runTestBody (package:flutter_test/src/binding.dart:1013:5) (elided one frame from package:stack_trace) This was caught by the test expectation on the following line: file:///home/runner/work/traffic_report_front_flutter/traffic_report_front_flutter/test/widget_test.dart line 19 The test description was: Counter increments smoke test ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ Warning: At least one test in this suite creates an HttpClient. When running a test suite that uses TestWidgetsFlutterBinding, all HTTP requests will return status code 400, and no network request will actually be made. Any test expecting a real network connection and status code will fail. To test code that needs an HttpClient, provide your own HttpClient implementation to the code under test, so that your test can consistently provide a testable response to the code under test. Test failed. See exception logs above. The test description was: Counter increments smoke test ##[endgroup] ```

Created Pull Request: https://github.com/yihong1120/traffic_report_front_flutter/pull/92

codeautopilot[bot] commented 6 months ago

PR summary

The Pull Request introduces a docstring to the didChangeDependencies() function within the report_list_screen.dart file. The purpose of this change is to comply with the coding rule that requires all functions and file headers to have docstrings. The added docstring explains that the function is triggered when the widget's dependencies change and that it is responsible for fetching reports and updating the widget's state.

Suggestion

No specific improvements to suggest for this PR as it is a straightforward documentation update. However, it is always good practice to ensure that the docstring is clear, concise, and accurately describes the function's behavior. Additionally, it might be beneficial to include any relevant information about the parameters, return type, or exceptions if applicable, although this function does not seem to have parameters or a return type that needs documenting.