search

yiskang / csharp-sqlite

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/csharp-sqlite
Other
0 stars 0 forks source link

Suggest we have one "engine" llibrary #32

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Today we have a set of .cs files that we include in multiple projects 
(testfixture, shell, etc.)  I'd like to suggest we have one library project 
that we include in all other projects rather than linking the source code 
files directly in each project.  This is "more dotnet like".

Original issue reported on code.google.com by Jay.Beav...@gmail.com on 12 Aug 2009 at 3:03

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
One of the value propositions of this port is that it can be included in a 
project 
without generating additional DLL files.  i.e. You can include it in an 
application 
that is deployed as nothing more than a single EXE file (indeed, we are working 
on a 
project that includes a "C# embedded" webserver and a C#-SQLite database and 
installation is as simple as downloading a single EXE file).

If creating a library project would cause an additional DLL's to be generated, 
then 
in spite of the "more dotnet like" advantages, it might be advisable to rethink 
this 
suggestion.

Original comment by Stringed...@gmail.com on 8 Sep 2009 at 9:04

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
At any time you can il-merge several DLLs into calling EXE. No need to prepare 
for
that in code.

Original comment by subm...@gmail.com on 9 Sep 2009 at 8:18

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Jay, this is your issue.  The points raised are valid.  What is your thinking 
about
why one engine is needed?

Original comment by noah.hart@gmail.com on 13 Sep 2009 at 2:20

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
The point is not much library vs. embedding the code. If we go with the library
approach, it won't be possible to take advantage of compiler directives. I see 
this
as necessary when compiling the code for Silverlight.
But adding a main Assembly .CSPROJ file is ok so we have the best of both 
worlds.

Original comment by enzinol@gmail.com on 15 Sep 2009 at 4:56

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Jay, Unless you have further comments on this, I will close the issue

Original comment by noah.hart@gmail.com on 20 Jan 2010 at 7:45

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago

Original comment by noah.hart@gmail.com on 26 Jan 2010 at 1:07

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago

Original comment by noah.hart@gmail.com on 17 Feb 2011 at 2:00