Closed kosfango closed 4 years ago
Would it make sense to remove internal recoding completely in favour of iconv? It can map 8bit -> multibyte but not back.
It will be sad if it break ftn2rfc (e.g. 866->uft8)
Well, at the moment it works with iconv only since I cannot remember 866->utf8 internal table (even if it is possible in practice).
How ftn2rfc works now? It seems no issues with gating echomail from fidonet
With iconv I guess, it's enabled by default.
but not back.
I mean these words or it's about other things not for ftn2rfc?
not utf8->8bits
I think, in case of ftn2rfc, all modern nntp client software have uft8 support out of box and by default. In this case, it shouldn't be a disadvantage, but not for case rfc2ftn
not utf8->8bits
Does Fidogate gating rfc2ftn without iconv uft8->866 now?
not utf8->8bits
Does Fidogate gating rfc2ftn without iconv uft8->866 now?
no
The original issue should be fixed by 212d5aa85e9c
charset.bin was not overwritten after "make install" command