Open yleeyilin opened 5 months ago
We acknowledge the use of 0 times
may be less intuitive compared to terms such as optional
. However, the term 0 times
is still technically correct, referring to the optional inclusion of parameters like illnesses. While the documentation is not incorrect, we recognise that the terms used could be clearer, hence we will assign as NotInScope
.
Team chose [response.NotInScope
]
Reason for disagreement: I believe that this problem is in fact valid since I was unable to understand what "0 times" means because 0 times made me think of using i/
where everything after that prefix is an empty space, when in fact your group meant that I can omit the entire term altogether.
Below is a screenshot of your user guide:
Expected / Possible Improvements: 0 times is unintuitive to the reader. It is clearer to use none at all / optional.
This is so as to ensure that your reader / user will not be confused or have a hard time comprehending what the restrictions are.