yochju / latex-makefile

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/latex-makefile
Other
0 stars 0 forks source link

Fatal error ignored #108

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
This is a really simple problem.  If I run the makefile, it completes without 
error, but if I run pdflatex by hand, it gives the following error:

!pdfTeX error: pdflatex (file rbfruntime.pdf): cannot find image file
 ==> Fatal error occurred, no output PDF file produced!

Original issue reported on code.google.com by amcna...@gmail.com on 31 Dec 2010 at 7:30

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
How are you generating the rbfruntime.pdf file?  When the makefile succeeds, 
does it create that file?

I'm going to need a bit more information to debug this, like how you are trying 
to include the image (e.g., using graphicx and includegraphics?) and what your 
log files look like.

Original comment by shiblon on 31 Dec 2010 at 7:36

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
As far as including it goes, I think issue 100 should set it straight.  I 
opened this as a separate bug because I thought it was a little odd that a 
"!pdfTeX error" line and a "Fatal error eoccurred, no output PDF file 
produced!" line were being ignored.

Original comment by amcna...@gmail.com on 31 Dec 2010 at 7:50

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
That is definitely odd.  Do you have a log file that I can look at (from when 
it was silently failing)?

Original comment by shiblon on 31 Dec 2010 at 8:25

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Here you go--I'm attaching a log file from the latest version of the makefile.  
I hope it helps.

Original comment by amcna...@gmail.com on 31 Dec 2010 at 8:29

Attachments:

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
On a related note, if a graphics file is missing, the make aborts with a "No 
rule to make target".  It would be convenient if it would build with an error 
instead, but if that's hard to do then forget I mentioned it.

Original comment by amcna...@gmail.com on 31 Dec 2010 at 8:59

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
It's supposed to emit an error in this case.  I'm surprised it isn't.  This is 
going to be tough for me to reproduce, so if you can do it minimally without 
giving away your work, that would help.

Original comment by shiblon on 31 Dec 2010 at 9:32

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Fatal error is now getting emitted.

I don't know about the other case, but it smells like an unclean build between 
makefile versions.  Feel free to reopen if not.

r6b82ba2b93a1

Original comment by shiblon on 31 Dec 2010 at 9:43